Minimax - In the Case of Future's Future's
In the Case of Future's Future's - Minimax
Big Pine CA
Dateline 9-12-07
One consideration of game theory and the Constitution is Minimax. In jurisprudence this is the choosing of the least damaging outcome as a baseline. In the consideration of strategic nuclear defense this is quite evident and is built around deterrence, second strike capabilities, and diplomacy. In general, constitutions provide for the framework of the government.
In the United States Constitution the Constitution itself simply organizes the structure of the government. This is a republican federalist model. There are 34 amendments that give substantitive rights to the individual. The 10th amendment returns rights to the states.The constitution is a perpetual association that is intended to conserve posterity for future's future's. It can only be changed from within itself.
Hence if a state that is legitimate has a civil war or a coup de tat and loses. The ensuing government is de facto or illegal. Hence we see game theory or defection in various nation-states. In Somalia the Islamic Courts decisively drove the standing government into Eithiopia. Ethiopia felt threatened by the Islamic Courts and invaded and reinstalled the older government.
Fidel Castro drove the corrupt Bautista government and mafias out of Cuba and replaced such with himself as autocratic ruler. The United Nations does not accept rule ad baculum or by force. However the old Soviet Bloc and modern China accept Revolution and by defection Cuba has mixed recognition and vis a vis protocols with the democracies lead by United States interests.
In Czechoslovakia the true intent of the dissolution of the social contract was clearly demonstrated with the civil division of the country into Czech and Slovakia.Hence in a theocracy the main goal is to develop the state to return the individual back to eternity. In civil states such appears to be the upholding of the rights of the individual and state. This usually has an equivalence in preventing tyranny and bad governance.
The Collective Begins With the Individual
Big Pine CA
Dateline9-09-07
In a direct parallel ISKCON is contemplating the development of a Constitution. In the United States Constitution the Constitution itself simply organizes the structure of the government. This is a republican federalist model Hence a central government that gives rights to the states with checks and balances. The latter is that there are three executive branches. That is the presidency, judicial, and legislative branches. The constitution creates a citizen then a president. The substantitive rights are in the Bill of Rights and the Amendments.Historically it is moot that defection in prisoner's dilemma has rendered this dysfunctional. Is this a nativistic or socialized deformity? It is both. Everything at the material level must have some basis in our genetics and structure than our relationship to the environment.
technorati tags:
Censorship
Corporate History
Ethics
Homeland Security
Human Rights
Journalism
Krishna
Gaudiya Vaishnavism
Law
Logic
Political Philosophy
Big Pine CA
Dateline 9-12-07
One consideration of game theory and the Constitution is Minimax. In jurisprudence this is the choosing of the least damaging outcome as a baseline. In the consideration of strategic nuclear defense this is quite evident and is built around deterrence, second strike capabilities, and diplomacy. In general, constitutions provide for the framework of the government.
In the United States Constitution the Constitution itself simply organizes the structure of the government. This is a republican federalist model. There are 34 amendments that give substantitive rights to the individual. The 10th amendment returns rights to the states.The constitution is a perpetual association that is intended to conserve posterity for future's future's. It can only be changed from within itself.
Hence if a state that is legitimate has a civil war or a coup de tat and loses. The ensuing government is de facto or illegal. Hence we see game theory or defection in various nation-states. In Somalia the Islamic Courts decisively drove the standing government into Eithiopia. Ethiopia felt threatened by the Islamic Courts and invaded and reinstalled the older government.
Fidel Castro drove the corrupt Bautista government and mafias out of Cuba and replaced such with himself as autocratic ruler. The United Nations does not accept rule ad baculum or by force. However the old Soviet Bloc and modern China accept Revolution and by defection Cuba has mixed recognition and vis a vis protocols with the democracies lead by United States interests.
In Czechoslovakia the true intent of the dissolution of the social contract was clearly demonstrated with the civil division of the country into Czech and Slovakia.Hence in a theocracy the main goal is to develop the state to return the individual back to eternity. In civil states such appears to be the upholding of the rights of the individual and state. This usually has an equivalence in preventing tyranny and bad governance.
The Collective Begins With the Individual
Big Pine CA
Dateline9-09-07
In a direct parallel ISKCON is contemplating the development of a Constitution. In the United States Constitution the Constitution itself simply organizes the structure of the government. This is a republican federalist model Hence a central government that gives rights to the states with checks and balances. The latter is that there are three executive branches. That is the presidency, judicial, and legislative branches. The constitution creates a citizen then a president. The substantitive rights are in the Bill of Rights and the Amendments.Historically it is moot that defection in prisoner's dilemma has rendered this dysfunctional. Is this a nativistic or socialized deformity? It is both. Everything at the material level must have some basis in our genetics and structure than our relationship to the environment.
technorati tags:
Censorship
Corporate History
Ethics
Homeland Security
Human Rights
Journalism
Krishna
Gaudiya Vaishnavism
Law
Logic
Political Philosophy
Labels: 2008 presidential campaign, censorship, environment, ethics, human rights, inyo, krishna, nollmeyer, political philosophy
posted by Kronin at 7:22 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home