General Systems Theory

Mechanism argues that all phenomenon are reducible to physics and explicable by math. Therefore the Theory of Mind at present is that the Mind is localized in the brain. Structure and process is electro chemical coordination. There are many problems as to where per se one’s name, John is localized. Is it one specific folder or more than one. It appears that if one part of the brain is injured another part may take over some of the functions of the injured area.

In theism, the Logos or whatever Mind in the Deity exists first. Our mind is localized in our brain. However it is connected in some manner to the Eternal Mind.

As Prigogine noted, "the basis for any natural law describing the evolution of social systems must be the physical laws governing open systems, i.e., systems embedded in their environment with which
they exchange matter and energy." (Prigogine et al., 1977, p. 2.) Without reducing the study of psyche to physics, systems theory promises to offer a powerful conceptual approach for grasping
the interrelation of human beings, and the associated cognitive structures and processes specific to them, in both society and nature.

Prigogine, I. et al. (1977). Long term trends in the evolution of complexity, Goals in a global community: The original background papers for Goals for Mankind, Ervin Laszlo et al.
(eds). Vol. 1: Studies on the conceptual foundations. New York: Dutton.

Open Letter to Officials Ducheny and Perez

Denise Ducheny

Manuel Perez

Dear Rep. Ducheny and Senator Perez

My name is David Nollmeyer. I am your constituent along the Salton Sea. I am complaining  as to why you or any sworn official has yet to recognize and preserve the constitutional rights and lives of the persons in you district.

The Salton Sea is chemically destroyed as are properties here.

I have been isolated for 22 years under these conditions.

There is a Gay Militancy run out LAPD that is responsible.

I am lifelong heterosexual whose spiritual identity and behavior Hare Krishna are against LGBTi interests. I am active in supporting Proposition 8 here in California.

This Chemical Scorched Earth is SERIOUS. I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT I HAVE MORE THAN A 10 PERCENT CHANCE OF LIVING TO 2020.

I am only 47 years of age. This is the same as Barack Obama and Mary Bono.

I HOLD YOU CRIMINALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THESE CONDITIONS.

I have a modest record of 26 Federal Court suits identifying the principals as well as complaints to sworn officials throughout the country.

I believe the economic collapse is designed as a catalyst to shake down dead wood and bring prosecution.

The study of Evolutionary Biology will also contribute to developing evidence against the corrupt.

I request that you take responsibility and RECOGNIZE THIS CHEMICAL DISASTER

Thank you for your consideration.

David Nollmeyer
Desert Shores CA
3-6-2009

Websites

http://powereality.net/
http://powereality.net/journals.htm
http://powereality.net/nollmeyer.htm
http://powereality.net/rico.htm
http://powereality.net/cambridge.htm
http://powereality.net/irrationalistpresidents.htm
http://powereality.net/nollmeyer.htm
http://powereality.net/lapd.htm
http://powereality.net/delaware.htm
http://powereality.net/strawman.htm
http://powereality.net/baltimorestudio.htm
http://powereality.net/cuestacollege.htm
http://powereality.net/se.california.htm
http://powereality.net/inyo.htm
http://powereality.net/n.california.htm
http://powereality.net/aboveground.htm
http://powereality.net/scores.htm
http://powereality.net/Compositions.htm
http://nollmeyer.tripod.com/cuestacollege.htm
http://powereality.net/kerry-bush.htm
http://angelfire.com/nollmeyer/index.htm
http://www.angelfire.com/nollmeyer/kazakh-bhakta.htm
http://www.blogcatalog.com/user/vamanadeva/activity

 

Technorati Tags: censorship,journalism,humanrights,ritvik,political philosophy,salton sea,law,nollmeyer,obama

Top Scientist Advocates Genocide for 90% of World Population

By Shawn Carlson, Ph.D on 26 Aug 2007

"HIV is no good, it is too slow to control human populations. Ebola zaire has potential. It kills nine out of ten humans." In late 2006, the Texas Academy of Science chose to honor one Professor Eric R. Pianka, an eminent ecologist who studies desert ecologies, with its 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist award. Professor Pianka used the occasion to champion the notion, apparently without sanction of the Academy, that the Earth can only be saved if ninety percent of the human beings alive today are purged from the planet. He championed airborne Ebola as the most efficient virus to accomplish this. And while he stopped short of calling for terrorist action to bring this result about, he clearly implied that this was a right and proper future for our species and our planet. Astonishingly, after advocating for a future in which more than 5,000,000,000 persons would die a slow and agonizing death, many members of the Texas Academy of Science stood to their feet and applauded.

I want to answer two questions here. Do academic institutions like the Texas Academy of Science have a duty to provide Professor Pianka a forum to advance these ideas? And what might the consequences be of allowing him to do so? My answer to the first question is a resounding "no." Furthermore, I am convinced that continuing to allow Professor Pianka unfettered access to impressionable students could one day lead to a loss of life that could make the Killing Fields of Southeast Asia look like a picnic ground.

Let me explain.

First, do Pianka's opinions deserve protection under the rubric of academic freedom? Well, that depends on whether this ideas are truly academic—that is, that they are consistent with the best understanding of our world that science has established.

Now consider Pianka's arguments.

Pianka claims that the natural world would be "better off" if there weren't so many humans. To see if that's true, we have to figure out just what constitutes the "natural world"? As an evolutionist, I see human beings as the products of the same natural forces that shaped all other life on earth. Our brains evolved on this planet subject to the same kinds of natural selection pressures as those that shaped peacock feathers. The same can be said of all of our social structures, our religions and every other aspect of what we are that helped us secure resources and propagate our species (the hammer and anvil of natural selection). In short, our institutions and our technology are every bit as much a part of the natural world as elk mating rituals and beaver dams. In fact, by evolving the ability to adapt the world to fit us , human beings have become better at securing resources and procreating than any other vertebrate on the planet. By this measure, we are evolution's most successful creation (amongst vertebrates). If extraterrestrials were asked to select nature's most successful vertebrate on the Earth they would certainly point to us.

http://news.iskcon.com/node/509

technorati tags:

technocrati tags:

Censorship

Corporate History

Ethics

Homeland Security

Human Rights

Journalism

Krishna

Gaudiya Vaishnavism

Law

Logic

Political