Monday, March 30, 2009

Open Letter to Boehner


Dear House Minority Leader Boehner

The last five presidents of the United States have failed to prioritize the homeland security needs of this country and thus protect the Constitution, citizen’s lives, and wellbeing. The country has been under a Chemical Scorched  Earth since June 17th 1987, the 200th birthday of the Constitution.

The creation of Homeland Security under George W. Bush itself is a farce. The Salton Sea here in California is chemically destroyed. Lake Almanor and the Owens River have also suffered catastrophic attacks.

This event or terrorist attack is being driven out of LAPD. Such contains a cell(s) of LGBTi militants. I am staunch heterosexual and defender of traditional marriage. I am supporting Proposition 8 here in California.

THERE IS NO LEADERSHIP IN CONGRESS! No individual that I know of, sworn official or homeland security officer has stepped forward to defend the natural lives of persons in this country and place the rule of law back in order.

The Republican Party most focus on reality not just tax cuts. Is AIG capable of paying on the trillions of dollars in damage.

The historical and legal record provides for documentation in the negligence to defend the United States since 1987. Hopefully the will to govern will be found before the damage to health and property necessitates such.

Thank you for your consideration.

David Nollmeyer 
Desert Shores CA

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

From Reagan To Obama


Ronald Reagan

185px-Himmler7 (1)

Heinrich Himmler


Barack Obama

The trajectory that Ronald Reagan undertook on June 17, 1987 was that of appeasement. In this sense a direct comparison to Neville Chamberlain is accurate. Ronald Reagan refused to recognize that electronic surveillance and intense human rights abuses were occurring. Then Attorney General Edwin Meese may also be seen as incompetent and corrupt.

The trajectory to buildups in cold wars and the fighting of wars must be reconsidered as low grade chemical assaults and scorched earth reflects upon the blackmailing and extortion of a head of state.

In the case of Ronald Reagan he was a target of a LGBT militancy run out of LAPD. Current President Barack Obama has committed the same errors as his other three predecessors. The continuity of this folly develops the ideology known as irrationalism and it’s subspecies fascism.

President Obama travels to Los Angeles, California on March 19, 2009. This will bring him into a zone where there is intense scorched earth.

Here there is ample social space and history to the development of a cult of personality. This is usually describes in terms of sociology but the increasing development of technology and the theory of mind that is electro chemical coordination in a structural process sense will add to the empirical observation has to the development of good government and tyranny.


Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, March 06, 2009

Open Letter to Officials Ducheny and Perez

Sen. Denise Ducheny

Denise Ducheny

Asm. Manuel Perez

Manuel Perez

Dear Rep. Ducheny and Senator Perez

My name is David Nollmeyer. I am your constituent along the Salton Sea. I am complaining  as to why you or any sworn official has yet to recognize and preserve the constitutional rights and lives of the persons in you district.

The Salton Sea is chemically destroyed as are properties here.

I have been isolated for 22 years under these conditions.

There is a Gay Militancy run out LAPD that is responsible.

I am lifelong heterosexual whose spiritual identity and behavior Hare Krishna are against LGBTi interests. I am active in supporting Proposition 8 here in California.


I am only 47 years of age. This is the same as Barack Obama and Mary Bono.


I have a modest record of 26 Federal Court suits identifying the principals as well as complaints to sworn officials throughout the country.

I believe the economic collapse is designed as a catalyst to shake down dead wood and bring prosecution.

The study of Evolutionary Biology will also contribute to developing evidence against the corrupt.

I request that you take responsibility and RECOGNIZE THIS CHEMICAL DISASTER

Thank you for your consideration.

David Nollmeyer
Desert Shores CA



Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, March 05, 2009

Fascism – Are We Heading There

As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace. Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.
Fascism is to be distinguished from interventionism, or the mixed economy. Interventionism seeks to guide the market process, not eliminate it, as fascism did. Minimum-wage and antitrust laws, though they regulate the free market, are a far cry from multiyear plans from the Ministry of Economics.

Under fascism, the state, through official cartels, controlled all aspects of manufacturing, commerce, finance, and agriculture. Planning boards set product lines, production levels, prices, wages, working conditions, and the size of firms. Licensing was ubiquitous; no economic activity could be undertaken without government permission. Levels of consumption were dictated by the state, and “excess” incomes had to be surrendered as taxes or “loans.” The consequent burdening of manufacturers gave advantages to foreign firms wishing to export. But since government policy aimed at autarky, or national self-sufficiency, protectionism was necessary: imports were barred or strictly controlled, leaving foreign conquest as the only avenue for access to resources unavailable domestically. Fascism was thus incompatible with peace and the international division of labor—hallmarks of liberalism.

Fascism embodied corporatism, in which political representation was based on trade and industry rather than on geography. In this, fascism revealed its roots in syndicalism, a form of socialism originating on the left. The government cartelized firms of the same industry, with representatives of labor and management serving on myriad local, regional, and national boards—subject always to the final authority of the dictator’s economic plan. Corporatism was intended to avert unsettling divisions within the nation, such as lockouts and union strikes. The price of such forced “harmony” was the loss of the ability to bargain and move about freely.
To maintain high employment and minimize popular discontent, fascist governments also undertook massive public-works projects financed by steep taxes, borrowing, and fiat money creation. While many of these projects were domestic—roads, buildings, stadiums—the largest project of all was militarism, with huge armies and arms production.

The fascist leaders’ antagonism to communism has been misinterpreted as an affinity for capitalism. In fact, fascists’ anticommunism was motivated by a belief that in the collectivist milieu of early-twentieth-century Europe, communism was its closest rival for people’s allegiance. As with communism, under fascism, every citizen was regarded as an employee and tenant of the totalitarian, party-dominated state. Consequently, it was the state’s prerogative to use force, or the threat of it, to suppress even peaceful opposition.

If a formal architect of fascism can be identified, it is Benito Mussolini, the onetime Marxist editor who, caught up in nationalist fervor, broke with the left as World War I approached and became Italy’s leader in 1922. Mussolini distinguished fascism from liberal capitalism in his 1928 autobiography:

The citizen in the Fascist State is no longer a selfish individual who has the anti-social right of rebelling against any law of the Collectivity. The Fascist State with its corporative conception puts men and their possibilities into productive work and interprets for them the duties they have to fulfill. (p. 280)

Before his foray into imperialism in 1935, Mussolini was often praised by prominent Americans and Britons, including Winston Churchill, for his economic program.

Similarly, Adolf Hitler, whose National Socialist (Nazi) Party adapted fascism to Germany beginning in 1933, said:

The state should retain supervision and each property owner should consider himself appointed by the state. It is his duty not to use his property against the interests of others among his own people. This is the crucial matter. The Third Reich will always retain its right to control the owners of property. (Barkai 1990, pp. 26–27)

Both nations exhibited elaborate planning schemes for their economies in order to carry out the state’s objectives. Mussolini’s corporate state “consider[ed] private initiative in production the most effective instrument to protect national interests” (Basch 1937, p. 97). But the meaning of “initiative” differed significantly from its meaning in a market economy. Labor and management were organized into twenty-two industry and trade “corporations,” each with Fascist Party members as senior participants. The corporations were consolidated into a National Council of Corporations; however, the real decisions were made by state agencies such as the Instituto per la Ricosstruzione Industriale, which held shares in industrial, agricultural, and real estate enterprises, and the Instituto Mobiliare, which controlled the nation’s credit.

Hitler’s regime eliminated small corporations and made membership in cartels mandatory.1 The Reich Economic Chamber was at the top of a complicated bureaucracy comprising nearly two hundred organizations organized along industry, commercial, and craft lines, as well as several national councils. The Labor Front, an extension of the Nazi Party, directed all labor matters, including wages and assignment of workers to particular jobs. Labor conscription was inaugurated in 1938. Two years earlier, Hitler had imposed a four-year plan to shift the nation’s economy to a war footing. In Europe during this era, Spain, Portugal, and Greece also instituted fascist economies.

In the United States, beginning in 1933, the constellation of government interventions known as the New Deal had features suggestive of the corporate state. The National Industrial Recovery Act created code authorities and codes of practice that governed all aspects of manufacturing and commerce. The National Labor Relations Act made the federal government the final arbiter in labor issues. The Agricultural Adjustment Act introduced central planning to farming. The object was to reduce competition and output in order to keep prices and incomes of particular groups from falling during the Great Depression.

It is a matter of controversy whether President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal was directly influenced by fascist economic policies. Mussolini praised the New Deal as “boldly . . . interventionist in the field of economics,” and Roosevelt complimented Mussolini for his “honest purpose of restoring Italy” and acknowledged that he kept “in fairly close touch with that admirable Italian gentleman.” Also, Hugh Johnson, head of the National Recovery Administration, was known to carry a copy of Raffaello Viglione’s pro-Mussolini book, The Corporate State, with him, presented a copy to Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, and, on retirement, paid tribute to the Italian dictator.

Sheldon Richman. "Fascism." The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. 2008. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved March 4, 2009 from the World Wide Web: