This a Human Rights Discussion blog. Your host is David Nollmeyer. I am a 14 year member of Amnesty International. All human rights issues are welcome.
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
The Singularity: Dial Om for Murder
The above outline focuses Barack Obama as the Singularity Target and my person Bhakta David Nollmeyer as the Singularity Expirement.
On June 17, 2015, the 27th Anniversary of the Manifest Function of MOEC, Dylan Storm Roof entered the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston South Carolina and killed nine persons including the Pastor Emmanuel Pinckey. This occurred during an open Bible Study. Storm announced that he was there to "shoot black people". He told a female that he spared her life so she could tell his story.
An online manifesto on Storm's website contained 60 plus pictures. The pictures date from August 3, 2014 to June 17, 2015 the day of the shooting. My birthday is August 3, 1961. Barack' Obama's birthday is August 3 1961.
The site now longer has the pictures available but text is here:
The first sites below are blogs. The first was originally name Dead Man Talking. I changed the name to Cornerstones... around 2007. Kronin would be real name hence David Kronin descending from Dublin, Ireland.
Concerning the Misprision of Treason, how many times has June 17, 1987 been mentioned on these sites alone?
The powereality handle has been the root regardless of the domain for my system. The Irrationalist Presidents site has been hacked. This was another site that emerged in attempt to learn WYSIWYG editors. It works online but I am being prevented for developing the material. I have been using Frontpage, Expressions, or Amaya. Now I have to code all the html 5 by hand. I am going into full block mode.
As stated the in continuo Chemical Assault - Scorched Earth began on June 17, 1987. Much of my work was written in Glenwood, New Mexico. I used to have to take a roundabout route through then Arizona 666 a state road to this outpost. The cue here is from the film Natural Born Killers. Hence the villians kill persons but drop off a victim along this highway to tell the story. Another important detail is the events concerning Dead Man Walking and the abolition of the death penalty occurred with Sister Helen Prejean versus then Governor George W Bush of Texas.
In continuation, how much of Dylan Storm Roof's actions reflect defection through a police agency. Further the chain of discovery in a War Crime Trial will reveal that the big lie is a system of small lies. Hence argument of a case by line and with Equal Protection and Due Process would likely set numerous precedents and clarify the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Dial Om for Murder was published was published April 9, 1987 in Rolling Stone:
http://surrealist.org/jpgspdfs/dial_om.pdf
The 25th district has been the site of an in continuo Chemical Assault Scorched Earth program since June 17, 1987 under then President Ronald Reagan. Since this time period there have been five successive Irrationalist Presidents now with Barack Obama in charge. I have a history in Inyo County and Owens Valley since about 1980. From 1997 Inyo County has been the most common jurisdiction in the United States to experience what is named Mobilization of Empire and Civilization or MOEC when I returned to California from New Mexico.
It is argued that MOEC is the mechanism that expands and contracts the British Empire.
The allegation is that Cambridge Law School is the proximate cause and authorship of this attack on the United States. If true then the Fall of the Anglo American Paradigm is iconoclastic or the destruction of sacred and political symbols is from within the same group.
MOEC is LGBTi based. It is likely the work of all same sex male perhaps with a confrontation of heterosexual Trinity theologians against the homosexual Cambridge lawyers.
The attack proves definitively that if one individual is alienated from their Constitutional Rights the collective will suffer.
I am the only individual with the entire attack imposed over their person. As such I am the only witness to the entire event although the entire state of California at 38 millions is clearly affected.
Past Representative Bud Mckeon has been legally responsible here for the breadth of this time period.
(1993 – 2015)
Origin is a GUI or symbolic artifact of MOEC which is a prisoner's dilemma based defection model.
Origin
Control
Particular History and Justice
Parameters
Maze
Consciousness
Consciousness
Rationality
Rationality
Behaviorism
Behaviorism
Atomization
Ideal State - Varna Asrama
There is over $83 trillion dollars USD in private wealth in the United States. Inyo County has seen it's population fall from over 20,000 to just over 18,000.
The county has one of the lowest per capita incomes which has been at $20,000.
The concept of treason creates an exclusive. As such United States History and the legal disposition of the Chemical Assault will revolve are these statutes.
TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART I - CRIMES CHAPTER 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
§ 2381. Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
§ 2382. Misprision of treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
Book of Hosea
Hosea an Old Testament prophet, whose name means Deliverance, provides a very focused but subtle template for defining the organization of Gay Irrationalism Gay Know Nothing which is a descent of informants and traitors from the Membership of Cambridge Law School. This also appears to provide a linkage to Trinity theologians who were a lesser evil.
In the Book of Hosea Chapter 4 verse six the operative is provided:
6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.
The use of the Attorney General Exemption for the President is also defined in 4.4. "for thy people are as they that strive with the priest."
Ethnic Nationalism and localism is used to create an individual and group base on incompetence and corruption. An exception or exemption is the foil used to recruit persons on a Yellow Brick Road fashioned as business deal in lieu of a covenant or constitution between the government and it's people.
The United State Federal Government will have a difficult time repaying criminal and civil penalties.
Inyo County is a lightning rod source for witnesses and evidence in a future Nuremberg War Crime styled trial.
As you begin your term serving this district you should not remain passive as Reagan - Obama - McKeon.
The alter ego to MOEC is the Islamic State. These actors use summary executions and apologists to these killings. The United States and Britain uses cenorship and sanitization to cover a homosexual blackmail ring tagged with a Chemical Assault - Scorched Earth.
Cambridge uses a Gay Irrationalist Gay Know Nothing model that targets an 80 IQ. Common sense or the average person is 100 IQ. This posits the Ethnic Nationalist Localist failing a future sixth grade exit exam on MOEC History. This would likely lead to dependence on a fascist welfare state.
I am a resident of Inyo County but am writing from Weed CA.
Thank you for your consideration. Bhakta David Nollmeyer Weed CA May 14, 2015
Transparency International is a NGO that monitors political and corporate corruption. There are chapters in 100. There are none in the United States. In March of 2012 Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was given this nation-states award for Integrity. Hillary Clinton is the chief diplomat representing this country vis a vis with over 200 nation-states. She has violated her office as the United States is a hub in a clandestine Chemical Assault – Scorched Earth.
This attack has been in continuo since President Ronald Reagan in June 1987. President Obama has won and campaigned in two elections 2008 and 2012 while the Salton Sea and Colorado River were despoiled.
The Colorado River also is drinking water for areas of Mexico.
The link below is Transparency International’s summary on the United States.
Remarks at the Transparency International-USA's Annual Integrity Award Dinner
Remarks
Hillary Rodham Clinton Secretary of State
The Mayflower Hotel
Washington, DC
March 22, 2012
Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. Well, I am very honored to be here and delighted to be supporting the work of Transparency International-USA. Before government officials spoke as openly and loudly about these issues, Transparency International was already bringing corruption out of the shadows, sunlight being the best disinfectant. And so I am really here, first and foremost, to thank all of you.
I want to thank Alan for his years of service to our country and the foreign service; thank you so much. I want to thank you Claudia for assuming the reins of this very important organization. And I, of course, want to congratulate Coca-Cola. And Sonya, thank you for that very stirring description of the commitment that Coca-Cola has to the values represented by Transparency International-USA.
I know that the former – the predecessor to Claudia Dumas is Nancy Zucker Boswell who was just recognized, and I have a special reason for recognizing her again because she is here with her husband, Eric, who also happens to be the Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security at the State Department. So don’t try any funny stuff because Eric and his team are well-prepared. But I wanted to thank both of them for their service.
As you heard Sonya say, she was really accepting the award on behalf of the 700,000 associates of Coca-Cola. Well, I am accepting it on behalf of the people across the United States Government, not only from the State Department and USAID but from Treasury, from Commerce, from the SEC, from Justice – represented by our Assistant Secretary for Criminal Law, from representatives to the OECD, the United Nations, the G-20, and so many other dedicated public servants who serve you by waking up every single morning trying to figure out what more we can do to reduce corruption, to create transparency, accountability, and better governance. They will never receive an award like this and their names are not likely to be known. But they are fighting the fight day in and day out.
Now Al said we have made this a high priority, and indeed we have. We’ve tried to put it right at the center of the work that we do in diplomacy and development. And why? Well, very simply, we have an interest in reducing poverty and sparking economic growth around the world, in creating greater security, prosperity, and even peace. And we know that corruption and the lack of transparency eats away like a cancer at the trust people should have in their government, at the potential for broad-based, sustainable, inclusive growth. Corruption stifles entrepreneurship, siphons funding away from critical services, poor fiscal transparency makes it impossible to hold governments accountable. And if these problems go on long enough, if they run deep enough, they literally can and have been shaking societies to the core.
The vegetable vendor that Al mentioned certainly is a prime example of that. But we so much evidence of the increasing awareness and rejection by people of the corruption that has been for the millennia just taken for granted.
Anyone who doubts the power of frustrated citizens to rise up need not only look at the Middle East and North Africa, but increasingly across the globe because social media has given every citizen a tool in order to report and literally post in the matter of seconds the kind of abuses that have been, up until now, just taken for granted. So this is an integral part of national security.
We also know that corrupt practices contribute to the spread of organized crime and terrorism. They underwrite trafficking in drugs and arms and human beings. And we have a major stake in building up partners who can work with us to take on these transnational threats and to promote stability, who will work with us to champion an international standard of behavior that gives more people in more places the opportunity to fulfill their own God-given potential.
The second priority for us is that the United States needs to spark growth not only abroad but right here at home. I’ve often spoken about what I call economic statecraft. It’s how America’s foreign policy can be the best advocate for U.S. businesses abroad, which will in turn drive our own recovery, and so we are seeking ways to more effectively use economic tools to strengthen America’s global leadership.
American workers and businesses remain the most innovate and productive anywhere in the world. I believe they – we can compete with anybody, anywhere, but it’s very difficult to do that if you don’t have that proverbial playing field being level so that your competition has a shot of winning.
And I know that with all of the businesses represented here tonight, you understand how unfair it is when competitors pay the bribes, pass the money under the table, prey on public officials in other countries to force or extort them to do their bidding. And oftentimes, it prevents American businesses even from making investments in certain places where clearly they should have a competitive advantage.
Now, of course, for every one of those officials who are taking cash under the table just to do his or her job, there are many who are refusing. There are leaders of integrity who are trying to look powerful people in the eye and say, “No.” But they need our admiration, but more importantly, our support.
So we have made it a priority to fight corruption and promote transparency, and the United States has been at this for quite a number of years now. In 1996, the United States played a major role in developing the first legally-binding commitment by governments to fight corruption. And we’ve led on many important fronts since then. But I’d like to just briefly describe what this Administration is doing.
First, we’re expanding and mobilizing a global consensus in support of greater transparency – a global architecture, if you will, of anticorruption institutions and practices. Along with Brazil, we launched the Open Government Partnership. It is a network of support for government leaders and citizens working to bring more transparency and accountability to governments.
Already, it’s helping to shape best practices like Indonesia’s innovative method of involving even small villages in decisions about how government funds should be spent. All told, 53 countries and dozens of civil society organizations are committing to these efforts. And I know that many of TI’s country offices, including TI-USA, will be represented at the Open Government Partnership high-level summit in Brasilia that I will co-chair with the Brazilian foreign minister.
We’re building this anticorruption consensus in other ways as well. In what is called the Deauville Partnership, we are working with our Arab partners on anticorruption, open government, and asset recovery efforts. At the OECD, we were pleased to welcome Colombia and Russia into the Working Group on Bribery last year. It will be an important milestone when both have become full parties to the Anti-Bribery Convention.
Now we know business cultures do not change overnight, but moves like this at least establish beachheads for reform. And through our bilateral diplomacy and at the G-20, we are encouraging major economies such as China, India, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia to join the convention as well. We support the follow-through that’s necessary to enforce anticorruption norms such as the new review process that promotes implementation of the UN Convention against Corruption.
Yet even as we work to build this international consensus and the tools to implement it, we recognize that there’s a lot of work ahead. How do we produce the concrete changes in people’s lives? So we’re working to help countries build institutions and create tools to promote good governance. Now sometimes it’s as simple as cutting down the opportunities for an official to exact a bribe in the first place – for example, by reducing the number of forms you have to fill out, or by encouraging countries to move toward e-Government, electronic government. In Afghanistan, officials have cut down markedly on corruption by paying members of the national police force by mobile phone instead of by cash.
In many countries, we have seen a lot of the security difficulties with their militaries and their police forces, due, in large measure, because the members either don’t get paid at all or get paid sporadically or get paid less than they should because large amounts of cash are transported, and every officer along the line takes his share. So we’ve been pushing militaries and police forces to move to mobile banking as a way to combat that.
Next month, we will launch an innovative fund to encourage countries to be more open about how they spend their revenues. It’s part of a larger effort we’re calling Domestic Finance for Development, an initiative to help developing countries increase their own sources of funding so they can meet more of their own needs. It’s really quite difficult in many countries when we see that they either don’t have any modern tax system or they don’t collect what is owed with the result that they are often unable to meet the most basic needs of their own people.
And so we’re trying to help not only governments, but civil societies get the tools and training needed to hold their governments accountable. I’ve been working for three years to try to improve tax systems and collection efforts in a number of countries, and I was very impressed with the quick work that President Perez Molina in Guatemala has shown in creating a tax system aimed at beginning to collect taxes from the elites in that country.
Corruption is a key focus for our strategic dialogue with civil society, and we encourage them to get educated about what more they can do. When I was in Kenya in August of 2009 and I spoke at the University in Nairobi, I was very struck by a sign at the entrance to the university which read, “You are entering a no-corruption zone.” And the young people who we’ve been working with in Kenya and elsewhere have made efforts against corruption one of the centerpieces of their organizing politically.
Finally, because our credibility depends on practicing what we preach, we are trying to up our own game. We recently announced our intention to implement the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in the United States, which will require disclosure of payments made by companies to the government and of payments received by the government from companies. Additionally, the Cardin-Lugar Amendment requires extractive industry companies registered with the SEC to disclose, project by project, how much they pay foreign governments. Now I know this has been a difficult issue, and the SEC is still working on the regulations, but we do think it will have a very profound effect on our ability to try to help manage some of the worst practices that we see in the extractive industry and in the relationships with governments at local and national levels around the world.
We’ve also launched groundbreaking efforts to make our development work more transparent. Go to the website foreignassistance.gov, because there, you can see where we are investing our development funds, and you can see that we are very committed to the global effort known as IATI to report our data in a timely, easy-to-use format.
And of course, this Administration, like those before us, has taken a strong stand when it comes to American companies bribing foreign officials. We are unequivocally opposed to weakening the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. We don’t need to lower our standards. We need to work with other countries to raise theirs. I actually think a race to the bottom would probably disadvantage us. It would not give us the leverage and the credibility that we are seeking.
So we’re looking to approach the issues that all of you here tonight are both interested in and committed to, and it does take everyone working together and it does take a lot of persistence and perseverance, but I am absolutely confident that we will make progress. We are so aided by social media now. We have tools at our disposal in the hands of literally billions of people that were never even dreamed of before. And we have worked through our 21st Century Statecraft Initiative to get those tools into the hands of more people to make them more usable, to encourage channels for people to be able to report corrupt practices – anonymously if necessary – as well as criminal activity of other sorts.
So we know old habits die hard. Human nature is what it is. But we think we have the potential to make even greater progress in the years ahead, and I’m very grateful to all of you and pledge that we will continue working closely together. Thank you very much. (Applause.)
No clear answers on same-sex marriage: In Plain English
It could turn out to be a nailbiter. After two-and-a-half hours of oral argument in the same-sex marriage cases, it was not clear where Justice Anthony Kennedy – and therefore the rest of the Court – was headed. Let’s talk about the oral argument in Plain English.
The arguments started with what many people refer to as the “marriage question” – whether the Constitution requires states to allow same-sex marriages. Representing the same-sex couples challenging the state bans, Mary Bonauto ran into tough questions from Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia. Roberts suggested that adopting Bonauto’s position would “redefine” marriage, adding that “every definition I looked up until about a dozen years ago” defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The plaintiffs could not have been encouraged when Justice Anthony Kennedy, who is probably their best bet to join the Court’s more liberal Justices to strike down the bans, echoed this idea. He told Bonauto that the traditional definition of marriage has been around for millennia, but it has only been a little over a decade since the Court held that Texas could not criminalize sex between two consenting adults of the same sex. That may be a long time for scholars, he pointed out, but it isn’t very long compared to the big picture, and “it’s very difficult for the Court to say we know better.”
Two other members of the Court’s conservative bloc, Justices Samuel Alito and Antonin Scalia, also left little doubt that their sympathies lay with the states. Like the Chief Justice, Alito reminded Bonauto that, until the end of the twentieth century, there weren’t any countries that allowed same-sex marriages. And later he expressed concern about whether ruling for Bonauto’s clients might require states to allow other kinds of marriages – such as a marriage between two men and two women. Scalia framed the question before the Court much as the states had in their briefs, telling Bonauto that the “issue is who should decide? You are asking us to decide for this society when no other state has had [same-sex marriage] until 2001?”
Arguing on behalf of the federal government in support of the plaintiffs, U.S. Solicitor General Don Verrilli faced a similar barrage of questions from the Court’s more conservative Justices during his fifteen minutes at the lectern. In particular, Justice Kennedy reminded Verrilli that in an earlier case, the Court had indicated that it should define a “fundamental right” in “its narrowest terms” – a precedent that would not necessarily bode well for the plaintiffs. What, he asked Verrilli, should the Court do about that rule in this case? As he had during Bonauto’s argument, Justice Scalia then suggested that the Court should leave the issue for “the people” to decide, but Verrilli countered in his final remarks that the plaintiffs in the case deserve to have their constitutional rights now, without being required to wait to gain public support.
John Bursch, the former solicitor general of Michigan, represented the four states. He began by emphasizing what was not before the Court: whether the four states were “ready” for same-sex marriage. The question, he made clear, was who gets to decide whether the states must allow same-sex marriages. And he asked the Court to uphold a different right: the voters’ “individual fundamental liberty interest” to define the meaning of marriage.
Bursch spent most of his oral argument time sparring with the Court’s four more liberal Justices – Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan, and Sotomayor – about the states’ rationale for prohibiting same-sex marriage. Bursch maintained that the states were not limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples because they wanted to confer second-class status on same-sex couples, but because of society’s vision of marriage as an institution centered around having children and encouraging parents to stay married and bonded to their children. The idea that marriage is about love and commitment is important, he said, but the state doesn’t have any interest in that idea. All four of the more liberal Justices seemed highly skeptical of his justifications. How, Justice Ginsburg asked, does allowing same-sex marriage take anything away from opposite-sex couples? Being married, Justice Sotomayor pointed out, doesn’t stop parents from getting divorced and abandoning their children. Justice Breyer chimed in, observing that a “very high percentage” of opposite-sex couples don’t have children, while a similarly high percentage of same-sex couples do.
Significantly, Justice Anthony Kennedy at times also seemed dubious of the states’ argument. Even if same-sex couples can’t have biological children together, he posited, they might still want the other benefits that come with marriage. Like his more liberal counterparts, he also appeared to question Bursch’s assertion that allowing same-sex marriages would harm opposite-sex marriages, as well as the contention that only opposite-sex couples can bond with their children.
After ninety minutes of oral argument on the marriage question, the Court turned to the second question in the case: whether states can prohibit same-sex marriages but nonetheless be required to recognize same-sex marriages that legally took place somewhere else. This question only comes into play if the states win on the marriage question; if the Court were to rule that each state is constitutionally required to allow same-sex marriages by its own citizens, it becomes a non-issue.
Arguing on behalf of the challengers in the case, Douglas Hallward-Dreimeier emphasized that the states’ refusal to recognize same-sex marriages is a “stark departure” from the general practice of recognizing virtually all marriages. This argument seemed to find some traction with the Chief Justice, who asked Joseph Whalen – arguing on behalf of the states – when his home state of Tennessee had last declined to recognize a marriage in another context besides same-sex marriage. The answer? 1970, in a case involving a stepfather who had married his stepdaughter. But at another point, the Chief Justice suggested that, given how mobile our society is these days, requiring states that don’t allow same-sex marriage to recognize same-sex marriages from other states would mean that “one state can basically set policy for the entire nation.”
So where does this leave us? Once again, it may all come down to Justice Kennedy, and he didn’t tip his hand during his questions and comments in the first part of today’s arguments. Kevin Russell, who contributes frequently to this blog, has suggested that the Chief Justice’s questions during the second part of the oral argument could be part of an effort to broker a compromise, in which the Court rules that there is no right to same-sex marriage but still gives the plaintiffs much of what they are seeking by requiring states to recognize same-sex marriages that happen somewhere else. Notably, however, Justice Anthony Kennedy was quiet during the arguments on the recognition question. Does that silence mean that he had already decided to rule for the plaintiffs on the first question, eliminating any need to worry about the second one? His colleagues will know the answer later on this week, when they meet to vote on the case. We won’t know until the Court issues its decision in late June, but when we do we will be back to report on it in Plain English.
Why Holocaust Remembrance Day Is Today Lily Rothman @lilyrothman
Ghetto Uprising Keystone—Getty Images 1943: Fire breaks out during the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising
Adolph Hitler
1937
The date marks the beginning of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising
The calendar year is full of dates that could be chosen for Holocaust Remembrance Day. Some, like January 27, the day of the liberation of Auschwitz, are recognized internationally. And, as Allied forces moved through Europe liberating Nazi death camps throughout early 1945, those dates continue to amass. So why is this Thursday, April 16, marked as Holocaust Remembrance Day in the United States and elsewhere?
As the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum explains, the date corresponds with the 27th of Nisan on the Hebrew calendar, which in 1943 — on April 19 in the Western calendar — marked the beginning of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. Though the date may appear to move around from year to year, it’s always on that anniversary.
The once-vibrant Jewish community of Warsaw was forced into a ghetto on the Jewish holy day of Yom Kippur in 1940, stuffed into an area scarcely bigger than a square mile, deprived and diminished and finally deported, as TIME’s Lance Morrow explained in a review of a 2002 book of eyewitness accounts of the infamous ghetto. As the population of the ghetto dwindled, some who remained began to organize for combat. On April 19, 1943, as the Jewish holiday of Passover approached, Nazi forces entered the ghetto with the intention of sending all of its remaining residents to camps — only to encounter the uprising. The Jews of Warsaw managed to fight back for weeks.
It would take years before the Nazi forces were finally suppressed in Warsaw and elsewhere, but the uprising was nearly immediately a touchstone for remembrance. By 1948, on the fifth anniversary, TIME reported on one such memorial:
Last week, on the fifth anniversary of the ghetto uprising, 12,000 Jews assembled on the spot where the first shots were fired. There they dedicated a monument to the heroes of the ghetto and to the 3,500,000 other Jews killed in Poland.
Delegations of Jews from 20 nations, including the U.S., laid wreaths and banners against the monument—a wall built of broken bricks from the ghetto‘s rubble piles. Mounted in a front niche was a bronze plaque showing armed men & women straining toward freedom. These were moving symbols to the Jews of Warsaw. But what they liked best, perhaps, was the shining granite that sheathed the monument’s wall: it was some of the Swedish granite that Adolf Hitler had ordered for his monument in Berlin.
In the Book of Hosea Chapter 4 verse six the operative is provided:
6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.
The use of the Attorney General Exemption for the President is also defined in 4.4. "for thy people are as they that strive with the priest."
A focus here should be on Ethnic Nationalism as a source of War - Nativism. The verbal cue of Being here is scripted. An eclectic to very basic form or cognitive behaviorism is used to create the target of the most incompetent and corrupt persons in American History. This is very decisive in LGBTi History and across all domains of knowledge.
PART I - CRIMES CHAPTER 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
§ 2381. Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
§ 2382. Misprision of treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
The Iranian Counterinsurgency against the Islamic State has slowed. It appears perhaps 200 Jihadhi are making a last stand in the city center. This is important.
The Islamic groups will acknowledge some of their actions which appear Irrational.
On the contrary the United States is using censorship and sanitization to obstruct the Domestic Chemical Assault – Scorched Earth.
This appears to be Cambridge Law School designed. It is LGBTi based and also indicates the exposure of this school’s Irrationalism War Criminals.
Bhakta David Nollmeyer
The commander of the powerful Badr Shiite militia has criticized “weaklings” in the Iraqi military who have called for U.S. airstrikes to support an ongoing campaign against the ISIS stronghold of Tikrit. The remarks by Hadi al-Ameri Sunday signal possible rifts between Iraq’s army and the Iranian-backed Shiite militias currently supporting the Tikrit offensive.
"Some of the weaklings in the army ... say we need the Americans while we say we do not need the Americans," Ameri told journalists when asked about U.S. air support, Agence France-Presse reported. The top Iraqi commander in the Salaheddin province where Tikrit is located had told the news agency earlier he airtrikes are needed to fight the militant group.
The battle to recapture Tikrit from ISIS, which began earlier this month, slowed in the past week as militias struggled to uproot militants from the city center where a few hundred insurgents have been holed up surrounded by snipers and landmines, the Wall Street Journal reported. Iraq’s government has had to rely on Iranian-backed Shiite militias to bolster its flagging forces ahead of the crucial battle.
The top commander of Iran’s powerful Revolutionary Guard’s Quds Force has played a crucial role in coordinating operations in Tikrit and al-Ameri cited the military leader’s engagement in the campaign as another reason American support was not needed. "Qassem Suleimani is here whenever we need him," he said. "He was giving very good advice.” Tehran also deployed advanced rockets and missiles to the country last week to bolster its efforts in Tikrit.
